Copy, right?
Comments
15 responses to “Copy, right?”
-
seems interesting, i’ll check it out !
-
i feel its about acknowledgement. whenever it was down and whoever did it, stealing someone else’s creativity, hard work, and ideas is wrong. maybe you dont agree, which is fine. maybe when someone actually did steal ur work you would appreciate how it felt
-
in the case that you refer to, everyone already knows the story was someone elses and his contribution is in his telling. but in the first case u mentioned, it was different. she neither acknowledged the source, nor was it implicitely common knowledge to everyone.
-
Now that you have finished the series, may I borrow them? I promise I will lend you “Adventures of Feluda” once I finish them.
-
plagiarism is a huge issue. It doesnt seem like dat big a deal when its some other parties involved.. or when its assignments 😛
but when you are sittin in the deputy deans “smart” scan software.. comparing your soft copy to google.. life spins to a blur and you wish u were dead or something 😛
-
Seems like an interesting series.. will look out for it.:)
And I agree with ricecar about the copyright issue..
-
bhai – what are you guys sharing? mujhe bhi chaahiye!
-
as they say, nobody’s idea is unique. quite a possibility that if u’ve thot about it…somebody on the opposite side of the world has probably already implemented it!!
bips
-
The Intellectual does, Right? It’s his Property after all!
-
cyberkitty: definitely should
prero: i do believe in intelectuals and their copyrights.. my point is that we are assuming that people dont have a problem if the source is acknowledged. what if someone took your work, acknowledged you as the source and made money out of it, none of which came to you. is that okay?
-
hyde: D is only on Part 2. besides, after personally experiencing it, i tend to agree with the first part of “He who lends a book is an idiot. He who returns the book is more of an idiot. ” 🙂
isha: damn, they have a software like that?
-
sqrl/ta: so what do you have to reply to my question then?
prero: yes, what are we sharing?
-
bips: these days, more so..
e: xactly
-
It boils down to acknowledgement and the popularity of the work. When you’re recreating the Ramayana, you will only get credit from the lay man for rethinking certain aspects of it, but not for the core themes of family, love, justice and so on. I say the lay man in light of the fact that we don’t have any tangible approval from Valmiki in writing. However, that is not a detriment to rewriting the epic, because recreationists acknowledge their inspiration and in the case of the Ramayana, even if they don’t, the lay man can decipher the origin.
But when it comes to such relatively obscure books such as the ones that Kaavya borrowed from, they require acknowledgement. It is a sad day indeed, when you copy off your predecessors without giving them their dues. Foolishness doesn’t even begin to describe the situation.
-
Alright, I won’t lend you mine. You can lend me yours.

Leave a Reply to manuscrypts Cancel reply