FB’s move to disaggregate apps, now seen in conjunction with FAN makes magnificent strategic sense. #digital<\/a> Oh, it’s a Saturday. Laters. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n\u2014 manu prasad (@manuscrypts) April 26, 2014<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\nIt got me thinking (again) on ‘scale’, a recurring theme<\/a> here. In a less complicated world, where the trends in the business landscape were significantly more linear, (growth, competition, consumption, economy) scale was a powerful weapon to wield. But it’s a different world now.\u00a0Artificial Intelligence, 3D Printing, Internet of Things, Wearables \u00a0and a hundred other things<\/a> might completely disrupt the status quo and the need an incumbent brand satisfies. These are the known ones, and then there are the conceptually invisible (at this point) ones. Surviving (let alone thriving) in this shifting scenario requires agility, and it is difficult (though not impossible) to see scale and agility together.\u00a0I looked to Google and Facebook for an approach towards this because not only are they surviving, they seem to be thriving. Yes, we’ll get to Amazon in a while.<\/p>\nWhat does it take to be agile at scale? I can think of four ingredients, the last three repurposed from the title of this post<\/a> by JP Rangaswami.<\/p>\nPurpose<\/h4>\n
I remember talking about re-defining of scale at the Dachis Social Business Summit<\/a>. The thrust of the presentation was that brands could engage consumers at scale only if they use currencies that create value for the user in the context of a shared purpose. I have elaborated it in this post at Medianama<\/a>. Recently, I saw that Hugh MacLeod has brought it out beautifully here<\/a>. Simply put<\/p>\n![\"Make-Things-People-Want-600x600\"](\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==\")
<\/p>\n
(via<\/a>)<\/p>\nPossibilities<\/h4>\n
The purpose need not have one constant rendition. As the landscape changes, a business will need to adapt it to suit changing circumstances. For that, a business needs to understand the possibilities. I saw a very good line in this post<\/a> about being a maker – the more you work in the future, the less competition you will have.<\/em>\u00a0How much into the future a business needs to be working is subjective and depends on its dynamics, but if it doesn’t disrupt itself, someone else will gladly do it for them. (“The Jeff Bezos School of Long-Term Thinking<\/a>” is a good read in this context)<\/p>\nPlatforms<\/h4>\n
While purpose and possibilities are all good at high altitudes, a business also needs strong operational \u00a0platforms to back it up. As organisations scale, I have seen two things that affect agility. One, the processes that are introduced to create efficiency @ scale more often than not, become the goal instead of a means<\/a>, slowing things down and taking away from actual goals.\u00a0Two, as processes and manpower increase, silos are created. The good news is that it is easy to see technology platforms bringing more efficiency into processes as well as an iterative way of thinking in the near future. It is already happening in marketing. This, and many other factors are also dictating a consumer experience driven approach and are forcing organisations to break silos. As the entire\u00a0brand\/organisation becomes a platform (read<\/a>) that regularly revisits its context and purpose in the life of a consumer, ‘everything becomes a node on the network<\/a>‘<\/p>\nPeople<\/h4>\n
HuffPo had a post<\/a> sometime back, citing Zappos, calling 2014 the year of workplace reinvention. It is interesting to note that parent company Amazon has apparently\u00a0aped<\/a>\u00a0Zappos’ ‘pay to quit’ policy, even as more and more stories about working there being a ‘soul crushing experience<\/a>‘ are coming out. Meanwhile, the two points it mentioned for this to happen are purpose and trust. These I’d say are the bedrock of culture. It’s intuitive that a workforce mindful of the organisation’s purpose and their role in it would keep an eye out for the business’ possibilities, be ready to work beyond silos towards a great consumer experience, and bring in others who would help the business scale. This, along with purpose, has to be the glue that holds it all together, enabling the organisation to move fast without cracking.<\/p>\nWhile different sectors are at disparate distances from a radical shift necessitated by technological developments, it is, I think, inevitable. In this fantastic post titled ‘Knowledge is faster than mortar<\/a>‘, which looks at scale through a different lens, the author makes the point that ‘the old mechanisms don\u2019t fit the new social structure.<\/em>‘ Old mechanisms were built to scale stability, new ones will have to be built to scale despite instability<\/strong>. Anti-fragile, so to speak. Indeed, we will see many manifestations as existing structures try to adapt – internal mechanisms like Amazon’s 2 pizza rule, consumer facing disaggregation like Facebook that have a corresponding internal wiring, or brands tweaking their 4Ps even further<\/a> for different contexts. But whatever paths businesses choose, this will hold true<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
until next time, the fast and the curious<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Prelude I think I used ‘dis-aggregated social network‘ on this blog for the first time in 2009, referring to Google’s basket of services that were connected relatively flimsily then. IMO, Google has always been that way, even including Google+. (read)\u00a0I remembered it when I tweeted this about Facebook – around the time news of their […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,23,98,6026,15,2538,6060,6027],"tags":[2596,2607,616,4487,4488,89,105,4269,4489,1066,3592,4490,3713,4097],"class_list":["post-8923","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brand","category-internet","category-future","category-ideas-future","category-social-networking","category-ideas","category-technology","category-work-org-culture","tag-agility","tag-amazon","tag-culture","tag-dis-aggregated-social-network","tag-disruption","tag-facebook","tag-google","tag-jeff-bezos","tag-jp-rangaswami","tag-people","tag-platforms","tag-possibilities","tag-scale","tag-zappos"],"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8923","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8923"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8923\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14874,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8923\/revisions\/14874"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"Make-Things-People-Want-600x600\"](\"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/Make-Things-People-Want-600x600.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"responsive-to-change\"](\"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/responsive-to-change.jpg\")
<\/p>\n