{"id":7676,"date":"2010-03-04T09:13:42","date_gmt":"2010-03-04T04:13:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.manuprasad.com\/blog\/?p=3263"},"modified":"2010-03-04T09:13:42","modified_gmt":"2010-03-04T04:13:42","slug":"effective-cause","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/2010\/03\/04\/effective-cause\/","title":{"rendered":"Effective Cause"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Pepsi Refresh <\/a>project is something I keep bumping into, inside this blog<\/a>, as well as conversations outside. I admit to a bias towards it, because I somehow sense a sincerity in its approach. Some time back, Surekha<\/a> shared with me a document<\/a> on which we debated a bit. From what I’ve been reading, Pepsi hasn’t given (at least clearly) this project a CSR label, so the debate over whether CSR money has been spent well or not is a little pointless. Besides it was more on crowdsourcing CSR .<\/p>\n

But thankfully, the national animal ensured that we continued the debate. Aircel’s ‘Save the Tiger’ has also not been given a label, but it does give a good handle to convey my thoughts on CSR, especially since there are at least a couple of good posts on it already, by L.Bhat<\/a> and Karthik<\/a>. Harish’s ‘Branding with a cause<\/a>‘ is a more general, but very relevant read in this context. Aircel’s high decibel campaign ensured that most of everyone knew there were only 1411 tigers left. If awareness was the objective, as stated<\/a>, it’s been done, especially since the slacktivist <\/a>generation has retweeted and facebook-fanned it so much that even the tigers must know now. They haven’t been asked whether they want to be saved in a planet full of us, but that’s a different debate. So is the debate whether Aircel should complete the loop, after all why can’t we? (and maybe there’s another phase anyway) But I digress, and generalise. Sorry.<\/p>\n

\"Clipboard02\"<\/p>\n

(Image Courtesy: Tom Fishburne<\/a><\/em>)<\/p>\n

The questions I have are these. Should CSR be related to the business domain or not? Aircel’s was not, but as Surekha rightly pointed out, they chose a topic that would connect with their target audience. My problem with that, though it helps stand out from the clutter in a commodity category, is the lack of context. With Pepsi, though one could say the project has nothing to do with sugared water, there was always a ‘youth’ context, which was established long ago. Now, if it were connected with the business, and it is possible with say, the pepsi project (surekha gave me at least 2 excellent ideas) I would turn around and say, vested interests, and doubt the sincerity of their efforts. ‘The big corporate giving us eyewash’ view. It would also bring in ROI measures etc, which I find hard to associate with CSR. Roshni<\/a> put it succinctly when she said ‘sort of like proclaiming, hey, we did charity’.<\/p>\n

In trying to find a solution, I remembered a post by Umair Haque on ‘Great to good<\/a>, which, perhaps unwittingly, made me think of a similarity between social media and CSR. As mentioned in my last post, the piecemeal approach to social media is something I dislike. Its as though it exists stand alone inside a box, I think I have a similar problem with CSR as a label. So, (simplistically put), what if the label were to be taken of and every process was carried out with an inbuilt csr approach – from creating environmentally friendly, sustainable products\/projects and choice of partners\/vendors to eco friendly packaging and everything in between? Oh yes, practical business considerations. I forgot. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n

until next time, with great responsibility comes great power?<\/p>\n

Relevant Read: Cause Effect<\/a><\/p>\n

PS: JK cement deserves appreciation for its support of an unrelated, but worthy cause – bikinis \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n

PPS: While on tigers, this one, by my good friend Blues, is a killer read<\/a> \ud83d\ude00<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Pepsi Refresh project is something I keep bumping into, inside this blog, as well as conversations outside. I admit to a bias towards it, because I somehow sense a sincerity in its approach. Some time back, Surekha shared with me a document on which we debated a bit. From what I’ve been reading, Pepsi […]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,15,2538],"tags":[2598,2859,2872,3146,198,3575,3710,3999],"class_list":["post-7676","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brand","category-social-networking","category-ideas","tag-aircel","tag-corporate-social-responsibility","tag-csr","tag-great-to-good","tag-pepsi","tag-pepsi-refresh-project","tag-save-the-tiger","tag-umair-haque"],"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7676"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7676\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}