{"id":7675,"date":"2010-02-18T09:49:32","date_gmt":"2010-02-18T04:49:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.manuprasad.com\/blog\/?p=3276"},"modified":"2010-02-18T09:49:32","modified_gmt":"2010-02-18T04:49:32","slug":"brands-and-consumer-social-influence-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/2010\/02\/18\/brands-and-consumer-social-influence-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Brands and consumer social influence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Sometime back, I had read a post on Inquisitr very interestingly titled &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.inquisitr.com\/55903\/lets-bring-some-reality-to-this-social-media-game\/\" target=\"_blank\">Let&#8217;s bring some reality to this social media game<\/a>&#8220;. Although my expectation of reality was slightly different from what the post delivered, I still found it a good read because it dealt with an issue that I have thought about several times. We even discussed it in the comments section of a\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.manuprasad.com\/blog\/2009\/07\/mob-bile\/\" target=\"_blank\">post<\/a> that (among other things) brought up the Kiruba-Cleartrip incident from last year.\u00a0 In my personal blog, I&#8217;d written about the &#8216;<a href=\"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/2010\/01\/27\/the-clique-friendly-web\/\" target=\"_blank\">clique friendly web<\/a>&#8216; in a tangential context &#8211; of bloggers with fan clubs perhaps losing objectivity and not tolerating a difference of opinion. The question, meanwhile, is really quite simple &#8211; should companies on social media sites give differential treatment to customers basis their &#8216;social influence&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A few weeks back, I saw a\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.web-strategist.com\/blog\/2010\/02\/03\/matrix-companies-should-factor-social-influence-in-total-customer-lifetime-value\/\" target=\"_blank\">post on Jeremiah&#8217;s blog<\/a> which dealt with the same subject. His point &#8211; &#8220;Just as companies factor in value of a customers celebrity status, buying power or customer loyalty \u2013companies must factor in social influence or put themselves at risk.&#8221; He has even created a matrix that shows 4 phases of\u00a0 incorporating social influence and the pros and cons of each phase. He has factored in both absolute and relative influence (influence in context of a brand\/company&#8217;s domain)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Let me try a context for this. Very simplistically put, I&#8217;ve always seen the consumer generated media as part of a media long tail. The traditional media is in the head, aggregators including Google, FB, Twitter are also there now, followed by forums\/discussion boards, influential blogs and then the individual accounts. So consider this perspective. Brands have always given preferential treatment to MSM simply because they reach a mass. And let&#8217;s just say not just in terms of using them for communication, but the overall experience for their representatives. With the rise of the web and a new set of aggregators gaining prominence, brands have tried to evolve processes for the system &#8211; from SEO\/M to blogger outreach to presence on Social Media. Yes, processes do help, but..<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">With search engines including real time updates in their results &#8211; Google even outlines how its Twitter algorithm\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.readwriteweb.com\/archives\/googles_tweet-ranking_algorithm_rewards_popular.php\" target=\"_blank\">works<\/a>, brands now not only have to listen, but also work out the way to handle all the messages being thrown at them, because they&#8217;d be deemed unresponsive otherwise. The phrase &#8220;there&#8217;s no dipping your toe in social media&#8221; comes to mind. So, should there be differential treatment?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">At this point, I know most companies would do exactly that, but I wonder if they&#8217;d then be just trading one set of media for another. I&#8217;ve seen many cases where a tweet from a relatively unknown (in my circles) person gets RTed and becomes a raging fire. It is perhaps easier to assign a process basis categories of social influence, but I think, unlike the structured media that has been dominant before, this is a web &#8211; of human connections, which is \u00a0more difficult to fathom, and have ways of inorganic spread that are no way close to measurement, yet. If indeed, there is a process to be set up, perhaps it should be more internal than external &#8211; involving different functional groups capable of thinking and reacting to specific domains and contexts. With services like Twitter planning on\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/twitter-tests-letting-multiple-users-tweet-to-the-same-account-2009-12\" target=\"_blank\">multiple identities within the same handle<\/a>, perhaps the old fundamental social media approach of people to people might help debunk what I am also inclined to believe &#8211; &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/magazine\/2010\/01\/st_thompson_obscurity\" target=\"_blank\">socializing cannot scale<\/a>&#8220;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">until next time, weighing scales \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">PS: If I consider posts on both blogs, this one happens to be #1000 \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sometime back, I had read a post on Inquisitr very interestingly titled &#8220;Let&#8217;s bring some reality to this social media game&#8220;. Although my expectation of reality was slightly different from what the post delivered, I still found it a good read because it dealt with an issue that I have thought about several times. We <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/2010\/02\/18\/brands-and-consumer-social-influence-2\/\">[&hellip;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,23,15,2538],"tags":[2812,2876,3312,166,3713,3782],"class_list":["post-7675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brand","category-internet","category-social-networking","category-ideas","tag-cleartrip","tag-customers","tag-kiruba","tag-media","tag-scale","tag-social-influence"],"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7675\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}