{"id":3859,"date":"2011-02-17T09:27:07","date_gmt":"2011-02-17T04:27:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.manuprasad.com\/blog\/?p=3859"},"modified":"2011-02-17T09:27:07","modified_gmt":"2011-02-17T04:27:07","slug":"attention-everyone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/2011\/02\/17\/attention-everyone\/","title":{"rendered":"Attention everyone"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was a strange coincidence that I watched the 62 Super Bowl ads back-to-back, (thanks to this <a href=\"http:\/\/mashable.com\/2011\/02\/07\/super-bowl-commercial-buzz\/\" target=\"_blank\">aggregation effort by Mashable<\/a>) on the same day that I read this very insightful post by Steve Rubel on &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.steverubel.com\/attentionomics-captivating-attention-in-the-a\" target=\"_blank\">Attentionomics<\/a>&#8220;. The slideshow is also embedded below. In addition to the key takeaways &#8211; the lifespan of content created on popular networks, it also suggests ways to overcome this.<\/p>\n<div id=\"__ss_6841334\" style=\"width: 425px;\"><strong style=\"display: block; margin: 12px 0 4px;\"><a title=\"Attentionomics Captivating Attention in the Age of Content Decay\" href=\"http:\/\/www.slideshare.net\/EdelmanDigital\/attentionomics-captivating-attention-in-the-age-of-content-decay\">Attentionomics Captivating Attention in the Age of Content Decay<\/a><\/strong><object id=\"__sse6841334\" classid=\"clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000\" width=\"425\" height=\"355\" codebase=\"http:\/\/download.macromedia.com\/pub\/shockwave\/cabs\/flash\/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0\"><param name=\"allowFullScreen\" value=\"true\" \/><param name=\"allowScriptAccess\" value=\"always\" \/><param name=\"src\" value=\"http:\/\/static.slidesharecdn.com\/swf\/ssplayer2.swf?doc=attentionomicsexternal-110207122813-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=attentionomics-captivating-attention-in-the-age-of-content-decay&amp;userName=EdelmanDigital\" \/><param name=\"name\" value=\"__sse6841334\" \/><param name=\"allowfullscreen\" value=\"true\" \/><embed id=\"__sse6841334\" type=\"application\/x-shockwave-flash\" width=\"425\" height=\"355\" src=\"http:\/\/static.slidesharecdn.com\/swf\/ssplayer2.swf?doc=attentionomicsexternal-110207122813-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=attentionomics-captivating-attention-in-the-age-of-content-decay&amp;userName=EdelmanDigital\" name=\"__sse6841334\" allowscriptaccess=\"always\" allowfullscreen=\"true\"><\/embed><\/object><\/p>\n<div style=\"padding: 5px 0 12px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.slideshare.net\/EdelmanDigital\">Edelman Digital<\/a>.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The interesting thing was that I would have watched the Super Bowl ads without any prompting. Which makes me wonder whether the logical and scientific way proposed above to &#8216;game&#8217; the attention economy is the best approach. I think my discomfort stems from the fact that this leans more towards the &#8216;media&#8217; in social media and looks at the social platforms from an information dissemination perspective.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">My consumption of the ads was more out of interest. The term &#8216;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Intention_economy\" target=\"_blank\">Intention Economy<\/a>&#8216; springs to mind immediately in this context.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>The<strong> <\/strong>intention economy is an approach to viewing markets and economies focusing on buyers as a scarce commodity. The consumers&#8217; intent to buy drives the production of goods to meet their specific needs. <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The thought is whether\/how this can be applied to consumption of content. If it can, then the approach would be to make the content as easy to find and accessible as possible, to &#8216;appear&#8217; at the time of demand, and create different contexts to drive that consumption.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">There is another perspective too. The easiest way to\u00a0 elucidate it would be with the example of Google Reader\/ Twitter Lists, where I pay attention to certain content creators, because I trust and value the content they produce. As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/47515988\/2011-Edelman-Trust-Barometer-Executive-Summary\" target=\"_blank\">Edelman&#8217;s Trust Barometer<\/a> would tell you, the &#8216;trust in experts&#8217; has actually increased this year. Their appeal does not really depend on the attention metrics.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Can&#8217;t think of any other &#8216;angles&#8217;, but if you do, please drop me a line, or comment.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">So perhaps like the owned-paid-earned forms of content, brands will have to work on all 3 fronts. Harness expert power (employees and others), seed efficiently, create and use contexts effectively, and be easily accessible (like the brand-stream I proposed last week)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">until next time, at ease now \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">PS: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.businesswire.com\/news\/home\/20110208006864\/en\/Research-Details-Consumers-Break-Brands-Email-Facebook\" target=\"_blank\">New research<\/a> on why consumers &#8216;break up&#8217; with brands on email, FB, Twitter, could be taken as a pointer to look at \u00a0 alternatives to information dissemination.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It was a strange coincidence that I watched the 62 Super Bowl ads back-to-back, (thanks to this aggregation effort by Mashable) on the same day that I read this very insightful post by Steve Rubel on &#8220;Attentionomics&#8220;. The slideshow is also embedded below. In addition to the key takeaways &#8211; the lifespan of content created <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/2011\/02\/17\/attention-everyone\/\">[&hellip;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,23,15,2538],"tags":[1317,2653,2942,2974,3242,1509,3831,3848],"class_list":["post-3859","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brand","category-internet","category-social-networking","category-ideas","tag-attention","tag-attentionomics","tag-edelman-trust-barometer","tag-experts","tag-intention-economy","tag-interest","tag-steve-rubel","tag-super-bowl"],"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3859","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3859"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3859\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3859"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3859"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3859"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}