{"id":3778,"date":"2010-12-23T09:19:57","date_gmt":"2010-12-23T03:49:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.manuprasad.com\/blog\/?p=3778"},"modified":"2021-01-02T11:15:51","modified_gmt":"2021-01-02T05:45:51","slug":"social-induction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/2010\/12\/23\/social-induction\/","title":{"rendered":"Social Induction"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">&#8216;Disparate&#8217; perhaps wouldn&#8217;t describe it best, but definitely 3 different posts in terms of scope and point of focus, but which I thought were in their own way, circling one of this blog&#8217;s favourite topics &#8211; how organisations can fundamentally become more social &#8211; not just from a usage of tools across its &#8216;silos&#8217; but more from an &#8216;adding meaning to the individual and society&#8217; perspective.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Stowe Boyd&#8217;s post titled &#8216;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.stoweboyd.com\/post\/2325281845\/are-you-ready-for-social-software\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Are you ready for social software<\/a>&#8216; not only gave me perspectives on the subject of the post, and title &#8211; social software, but also gave me a way to connect these three posts. He starts of with challenging the belief that Sherlock Holmes used deduction to solve the mysteries.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It turns out he (or better, Arthur Conan Doyle) was  using induction,  which is, according to Webster\u2019s, \u201cthe act or process  of reasoning from  a part to a whole, from particulars to generals, or  from the  individual to the universal.\u201d In working from a paltry  collection of  clues to a full understanding of the actions and motives  of the butler  and his victim, Holmes\/Doyle was, basically, developing a  picture of  the universe surrounding the crime from a few hints.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">He goes on to distinguish social software from software built for several purposes taken to mean &#8216;social&#8217;.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Social software is based on  supporting the desire of individuals to  affiliate, their desire to be  pulled into groups to achieve their  personal goals. Contrast that with  the groupware approach to things  where people are placed into groups  defined organizationally or  functionally&#8230;..Traditional groupware puts the  group, the organization or the project first, and individuals second&#8230;.. Social software reflects the \u201cjuice\u201d that arises from  people\u2019s personal  interactions. It\u2019s not about control, it\u2019s about  co-evolution: people  in personal contact, interacting towards their own  ends, influencing  each other.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Its a fascinating read and he quotes Kenneth  Boulding, the economist, humanist and social scientist,\u201cWe  make our tools, and then they shape us.\u201d I thought that was an amazing way to look at it, and if you think for a moment on how tools have changed the way you behave, interact, consume, I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll appreciate it too.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Amazingly, even without getting into software or technology, I saw an application of this thought process in Tom Fishburne&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/tomfishburne.com\/2010\/12\/the-wiki-wall.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Wiki Wall<\/a>, a symbol of organisational creativity that could prove more useful than the traditional &#8216;brainstorm&#8217;. The wiki wall (a real whiteboard\/surface)\u00a0 allows ideas to be shared, collaborated on, and evolve over a period of time beyond the silos that the organisation might have. Shared belief systems and thoughts around which people could group together.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Which then brings us to the &#8216;larger purpose&#8217; that an organisation exists for. This purpose is something that has popped up here many times in the recent past, the last being &#8216;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.manuprasad.com\/blog\/2010\/11\/a-social-culture\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">A Social Culture<\/a>&#8216;. I found it expressed extremely well in Umair Haque&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.hbr.org\/haque\/2010\/12\/unlocking_the_mayor_badge_of_m.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:+harvardbusiness+%28HBR.org%29\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">post<\/a> on the way &#8216;social&#8217; needs to evolve.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Social <em>is<\/em> significance. The real promise of social tools is  societal, not just relational; is significance, not just attention.  You&#8217;ve got to get the first right before you tackle the second \u2014 and  that means not just investing in &#8220;gamification,&#8221; a Twitter account, or a  Facebook group. It means thinking more carefully how to utilize those  tools to get a tiny bit (or a heckuva lot) more significant, and  starting to mean something in enduring terms.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For now, most organisations are looking at social tools (including software) to meet their business ends, and  not looking to make the business&#8217; &#8216;reason for existence&#8217; itself something  people &#8211; both employees and consumers- would associate with. Hopefully, by the time they deduct the importance of this, it won&#8217;t be too late.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">until next time, elementary? \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8216;Disparate&#8217; perhaps wouldn&#8217;t describe it best, but definitely 3 different posts in terms of scope and point of focus, but which I thought were in their own way, circling one of this blog&#8217;s favourite topics &#8211; how organisations can fundamentally become more social &#8211; not just from a usage of tools across its &#8216;silos&#8217; but <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/2010\/12\/23\/social-induction\/\">[&hellip;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,23,15,2538,6027],"tags":[3176,3243,3305,1066,3770,3801,3912,3914,3999,4054],"class_list":["post-3778","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brand","category-internet","category-social-networking","category-ideas","category-work-org-culture","tag-holmes","tag-interactions","tag-kenneth-boulding","tag-people","tag-social-business","tag-social-software","tag-tom-fishburne","tag-tools","tag-umair-haque","tag-wiki-wall"],"aioseo_notices":[],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3778","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3778"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3778\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15046,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3778\/revisions\/15046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3778"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3778"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/manuscrypts.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3778"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}